Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Southern Utilities

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiffs failed to preserve issue for appellate review where “plaintiffs had several opportunities to object to the proposed special instruction before the jury retired, but failed to do so”
• stating that evidence of a former co-defendants standard of care is relevant to show that the present defendant's conduct was not the proximate cause of the injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).