Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where court analyzes prior Kansas opinions in determining that the Kansas Supreme Court would adopt rule
• damage resulting from faulty or negligent workmanship constitutes an “occurrence” as long as the insured did not intend for the damage to occur
• “If the relevant facts are undisputed, the court may determine whether they are within the terms of the policy.”
• “When an insurer intends to restrict coverage, ‘it must use clear and unambiguous language in doing so, otherwise the insurance policy will be construed in favor of the insured.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).