Skip to main content
· 4/30/1951

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Coffelt

Citations

  • 11 F.R.D. 443
  • 1951 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3661

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring employer to articulate reason serves in part the purpose of “framing] the factual issue with sufficient clarity so that the plaintiff will have a full and fair opportunity to demonstrate pretext”
  • federal courts in section 1983 actions borrow applicable state statute of limitations
  • “A claim of undue hardship cannot be supported by merely conceivable or hypothetical hardships.... The magnitude as well as the fact of hardship must be determined by examination of the facts of each ease.”
  • \Disparate treatment of employees ... is not necessarily unreasonable.\
  • “Disparate treatment of employees ... is not necessarily unreasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.