Skip to main content
· 12/10/1987

Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Burts Bros., Inc.

Citations

  • 744 S.W.2d 219
  • 1987 Tex. App. LEXIS 8990
  • 1987 WL 199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating \[w]e conclude that the policy is subject to only one reasonable interpretation: the policy does not afford coverage unless the pilot has the qualifications and ratings set out in Item 7 of the policy\
  • stating “[w]e conclude that the policy is subject to only one reasonable interpretation: the policy does not afford coverage unless the pilot has the qualifications and ratings set out in Item 7 of the policy”
  • stating \[w]e conclude that the policy is subject to only one reasonable interpretation: the policy does not afford coverage unless the pilot has the qualifications and ratings set out in Item 7 of the policy\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jack Smith, Levy and Hoyt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.