Fidelity Bank, N.A. v. Unknown Heirs of Bowyer
Citations
- 209 N.E.3d 960
- 2023 Ohio 611
Syllabus
Foreclosure motion for reimbursement of advances confirmation decree abuse of discretion. - Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant-bank's untimely motion for reimbursement of advances because the motion was filed after the trial court entered a decree confirming the sale of the foreclosed property, even though such motions must be filed before the decree of confirmation to allow (1) the court to examine the accuracy of the fees prior to confirming the sale and (2) the mortgagor to dispute the fees in the confirmation proceedings and on appeal from the confirmation decree.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “review is limited to the record that was before the state court”
- noting Miranda’s recognition of such rights
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.