Skip to main content
· 11/30/1988

Fidelity And Deposit Company Of Maryland v. Krebs Engineers

Citations

  • 859 F.2d 501

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendant “waived any dependence on California law” when it “relied solely on Wisconsin law” in litigating contract damages issues
  • “Other courts have given effect to consequential damages disclaim‐ ers even when exclusive remedies failed of their essential pur‐ poses. … But whatever the merit of Krebs’ argument as an original matter, it is now Wisconsin law.”
  • “Other courts have given effect to consequential damages disclaim‐ ers even when exclusive remedies failed of their essential pur‐ poses. … But whatever the merit of Krebs’ argument as an original matter, it is now Wisconsin law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.