Skip to main content
· 2/8/1990

Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Zandstra

Citations

  • 756 F. Supp. 429
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18243
  • 1991 WL 12722

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the FDIC, acting as receiver for a failed institution in claims against the institution’s officers and directors, carried no threat of collusion and did not fall under the intent of the “insured vs. insured” exclusion
  • “FDIC does not strictly ‘step into the shoes’ of a failed bank.”
  • Exhibit C to RTC/FDIC Request for Judicial Notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwarzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.