· 2/8/1990
Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Zandstra
Citations
- 756 F. Supp. 429
- 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18243
- 1991 WL 12722
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the FDIC, acting as receiver for a failed institution in claims against the institution’s officers and directors, carried no threat of collusion and did not fall under the intent of the “insured vs. insured” exclusion
- “FDIC does not strictly ‘step into the shoes’ of a failed bank.”
- Exhibit C to RTC/FDIC Request for Judicial Notice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwarzer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.