Fidelia Reyes v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the failure to follow the “specific rules of law that must be followed in weighing particular types of evidence in disability cases . . . constitutes reversible error”
• explaining that the failure to follow the “specific rules of law that must be followed in weighing particular types of evidence in disability cases . . . constitutes reversible error”
• explaining that conflicts in the evidence are for the ALJ to resolve
• “the Secretary must give substantial weight to the evidence and opinion of the claimant’s treating physician”
• “There are specific rules of law that must be followed in weighing particular types of evidence in disability cases. Failure to follow these rules constitutes reversible error.” (citation omitted)
• “There are specific rules of law that must be followed in weighing particular types of evidence in disability cases. Failure to follow these rules constitutes reversible error.” (internal citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).