E.D. Pennsylvania· 6/4/1986
Fickinger v. C.I. Planning Corp.
Citations
- 646 F. Supp. 622
- 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24653
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that to attempt to establish as a matter of legal certainty the value of a claim in the notice “would defeat the purpose of disposing of a ease by settlement rather than trial”
- expenses reduced for failure to articulate and support value and reasonableness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shapiro
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Activision Securities LitigationN.D. California· 1989-10-03· cited 77×
- Mashburn v. National Healthcare, Inc.M.D. Alabama· 1988-04-08· cited 52×
- Varacallo v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceD. New Jersey· 2005-02-15· cited 48×
- Dehoyos v. Allstate Corp.W.D. Texas· 2007-02-21· cited 47×
- Lachance v. HarringtonE.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-04-10· cited 45×
- Edwards v. Alaska Pulp Corp.Alaska Supreme Court· 1996-06-28· cited 38×
- In re AremisSoft Corp. Securities LitigationD. New Jersey· 2002-07-31· cited 29×
- In Re Unisys Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits Erisa LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 1995-03-20· cited 27×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Southern Publishing Co.S.D. Mississippi· 1988-12-22· cited 20×
- Petruzzi's, Inc. v. Darling-Delaware Co., Inc.M.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-08-18· cited 15×
- Purdy v. Security Savings & Loan Ass'nE.D. Wisconsin· 1989-12-22· cited 12×
- In Re Chrysler Motors Corp. Overnight Ep Lit.E.D. Missouri· 1990-04-26· cited 10×
- Krangel v. Golden Rule Resources, Ltd.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2000-07-22· cited 6×
- Metropolitan Pittsburgh Crusade for Voters v. City of PittsburghW.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-05-18· cited 5×
- Davies v. Continental BankE.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-11-16· cited 3×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 17,202×
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court· 1984-03-21· cited 7,642×
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court· 1975-05-12· cited 4,586×
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 3,533×
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court· 1976-06-14· cited 2,447×
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court· 1970-01-26· cited 1,683×
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationSecond Circuit· 1974-03-13· cited 1,333×
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court· 1980-02-19· cited 897×
- Evans v. Jeff D. Ex Rel. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1986-06-09· cited 504×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,755, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,074 William B. Weinberger v. James C. Kendrick, Charles M. CoyneSecond Circuit· 1983-01-26· cited 443×
- Girsh v. JepsonThird Circuit· 1975-07-25· cited 427×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,547 Arthur Newman v. Howard M. Stein, and Morrie Benson and Rose Lerman, Objectants-AppellantsSecond Circuit· 1972-06-29· cited 268×
- Ursic v. Bethlehem MinesThird Circuit· 1983-10-19· cited 250×
- SHARP, Stanley L. v. COOPERS & LYBRAND, AppellantThird Circuit· 1981-06-05· cited 225×
- In re Fine Paper Antitrust LitigationThird Circuit· 1984-12-13· cited 196×
- Ladmer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 181×
- Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. Of Philadelphia v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Third Circuit· 1976-07-26· cited 172×
- Mabel FLINN, Et Al., Appellants, v. FMC CORPORATION and Local 9 Textile Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO, AppelleesFourth Circuit· 1976-03-22· cited 168×
- Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc.Third Circuit· 1972-03-31· cited 155×
- Weight Watchers of Philadelphia, Inc. v. Weight Watchers International, Inc.Second Circuit· 1972-01-20· cited 152×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.