Fichter v. Board of Environmental Protection

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that additional procedures were not necessary when the parties “had ample opportunity to present evidence”
• stating that due process \requirements are flexible and entail no specified form or procedure\; instead, \[w]hat process is due will vary from case to case ... to assure the basic fairness of each particular action according to its circumstances\ (alterations in original
• stating that due process “requirements are flexible and entail no specified form or procedure”; instead, “[w]hat process is due will vary from case to case . . . to assure the basic fairness of each particular action according to its circumstances” (alterations in original)
• evaluating the constitutional adequacy of the procedure in an 80C appeal
• the state and federal constitutional due process requirements are identical
• state and federal due process requirements are identical

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).