Fichera v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting state's concession that trial court abused its discretion when setting the amount of restitution, because competent evidence supported the trial court’s assessment
• rejecting state’s concession that trial court abused its discretion when setting the amount of restitution, because competent evidence supported the trial court’s assessment
• affirming in part, despite the State’s concession of error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).