· 12/20/2006
Fibreboard Corp. v. Celotex Corporation
Citations
- 472 F.3d 1318
- 57 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 347
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 31305
- 47 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 134
- 2006 WL 3740302
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Every court that has expressly applied Section 509(b)(2) has held that it excludes those who are primarily liable for the debt from subrogation because they received consideration for paying the debt.”
- “Every court that has expressly applied Section 509(b)(2) has held that it excludes those who are primarily liable for the debt from subrogation because they received consideration for paying the debt.”
- “Every court that has expressly applied Section 509(b)(2) has held that it excludes those who are primarily liable for the debt from subrogation because they received consideration for paying the debt.”
- “Every court that has expressly applied Section 509(b)(2) has held that it excludes those who are primarily liable for the debt from subrogation because they received consideration for paying the debt.”
- “Every court that has expressly applied Section 509(b)(2) has held that it excludes those who are primarily liable for the debt from subrogation because they received consideration for paying the debt.”
- “Every court that has expressly applied Section 509(b)(2) has held that it excludes those who are primarily liable for the debt from subrogation because they received consideration for paying the debt.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Birch, Black, Mills, Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.