Skip to main content
· 8/8/2006

Ferry v. Ashcroft

Citations

  • 457 F.3d 1117
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 20264
  • 2006 WL 2258805

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the petitioner's changed circumstance argument constituted a \challenge to an exercise of discretion that remains outside our scope of review\
  • holding that petitioner’s challenge to detention without a bond hearing was moot where he was no longer in custody
  • noting that district courts lack “jurisdiction over habeas petitions challenging final orders of removal”
  • alien must file a petition for review in the court of appeals to challenge a removal order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tacha, Seymour, Briscoe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.