Ferris v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring an opportunity to amend because “[t]he trial court did not deny the claim on the basis of facial insufficiency, and, as such, the appellant could not have been aware of the application of Spera [v. State, 971 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 2007),] to this issue”
• “The trial court did not deny the claim on the basis of facial insufficiency, and, as such, the appellant could not have been aware of the application of Spera to this issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ferris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-10-10· cited 13×
• Stephen Elliot Drakus v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-06-01· cited 4×
• Juan Pantoja v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-09-05· cited 1×
• Coty Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-11-27
• Jonathan Hartley v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-07-10

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Spera v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-11-01· cited 504×
• Watson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-02-19· cited 21×
• Sampson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-22· cited 2×