Skip to main content
· 6/3/1993

Ferris v. Bakery, Confectionery and Tobacco Union, Local 26

Citations

  • 867 P.2d 38
  • 17 Brief Times Rptr. 875
  • 144 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2380
  • 1993 Colo. App. LEXIS 156
  • 1993 WL 188898

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a sexual harassment claim brought under the Colorado Anti Discrimination Act was not precluded by the exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act
  • stating that plaintiff presented strong evidence that the union president's unwelcome sexual advances were specifically targeted at her and not neutral in nature, and thus finding a genuine factual controversy regarding the employment nexus
  • upholding district court’s order denying employer summary judgment on CBA-covered employee’s wrongful-discharge claim
  • “The Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act creates a comprehensive remedial scheme to deal with unlawful discrimination in employment, including sexual harassment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taubman, Hume, Davidson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.