· 6/3/1993
Ferris v. Bakery, Confectionery and Tobacco Union, Local 26
Citations
- 867 P.2d 38
- 17 Brief Times Rptr. 875
- 144 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2380
- 1993 Colo. App. LEXIS 156
- 1993 WL 188898
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a sexual harassment claim brought under the Colorado Anti Discrimination Act was not precluded by the exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act
- stating that plaintiff presented strong evidence that the union president's unwelcome sexual advances were specifically targeted at her and not neutral in nature, and thus finding a genuine factual controversy regarding the employment nexus
- upholding district court’s order denying employer summary judgment on CBA-covered employee’s wrongful-discharge claim
- “The Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act creates a comprehensive remedial scheme to deal with unlawful discrimination in employment, including sexual harassment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Taubman, Hume, Davidson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.