Supreme Court of Connecticut· 6/30/1959
Ferriola v. Burdick
Citations
- 146 Conn. 574
- 153 A.2d 319
- 1959 Conn. LEXIS 212
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that amount of prior recovery was “completely irrelevant” because plaintiff admitted prior injury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Daly, Baldwin, King, Murphy, Mellitz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Nepple v. WeifenbachSupreme Court of Iowa· 1979-01-24· cited 16×
- Larsen v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1998-05-14· cited 14×
- Boyd v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court· 1980-11-26· cited 13×
- Leslie v. HiggasonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-10-27· cited 3×
- Williams v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-04· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.