Ferring B v. v. Watson Laboratories, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court has discretion to consider an amended ANDA after issuing a decision but before final judgment
• noting also that, other than simply asserting that it carved out the HE indication and providing the court with the amended label, Norwich “ha[d] presented no evidence in support of its assertion” that the amended ANDA would no longer infringe the HE patents
• noting also that, other than simply asserting that it carved out the HE indication and providing the court with the amended label, Norwich “ha[d] presented no evidence in support of its assertion” that the amended ANDA would no longer infringe the HE patents
• “We think that the district court did not err in giving the term ‘about’ its ordinary meaning and in refusing to give it a more specific construction.”
• “A case becomes moot when interim relief or events have eradicated the effects of a defendant’s act or omission, and there is no reasonable expectation that the alleged violation will recur.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).