Skip to main content
· 12/15/1916

Ferrell v. Childress

Citations

  • 172 Ky. 760
  • 189 S.W. 1149
  • 1916 Ky. LEXIS 274

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that spoliation creates a 9 “dilemma” because “there is no way to know what the spoliated evidence would have 10 revealed”
  • requiring the party requesting fees to submit detailed documents supporting its request and to share a cope with opposing counsel
  • finding willful suppression of evidence when a party hid highly relevant and clearly discoverable evidence and repeatedly was not forthcoming with evidence
  • noting 16 these “two sources of authority” for imposing spoliation sanctions
  • declining to impose terminating 6 sanctions against plaintiff even though “the risk of prejudice to Defendant is great” and 7 plaintiff had history of discovery violations because “there is an appropriate less drastic 8 sanction that can be imposed”
  • “the applicable standard of proof for spoliation in the Ninth Circuit appears to be 11 by a preponderance of the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Turner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.