· 12/15/1916
Ferrell v. Childress
Citations
- 172 Ky. 760
- 189 S.W. 1149
- 1916 Ky. LEXIS 274
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that spoliation creates a 9 “dilemma” because “there is no way to know what the spoliated evidence would have 10 revealed”
- requiring the party requesting fees to submit detailed documents supporting its request and to share a cope with opposing counsel
- finding willful suppression of evidence when a party hid highly relevant and clearly discoverable evidence and repeatedly was not forthcoming with evidence
- noting 16 these “two sources of authority” for imposing spoliation sanctions
- declining to impose terminating 6 sanctions against plaintiff even though “the risk of prejudice to Defendant is great” and 7 plaintiff had history of discovery violations because “there is an appropriate less drastic 8 sanction that can be imposed”
- “the applicable standard of proof for spoliation in the Ninth Circuit appears to be 11 by a preponderance of the evidence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Turner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.