Missouri Court of Appeals· 7/31/1979
Ferrari v. Ferrari
Citations
- 585 S.W.2d 546
- 1979 Mo. App. LEXIS 2440
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[i]nsofar as such a proceeding affects status only, the action is in rem or quasi-in-rem and requires only that the res be before the court upon proper notice.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crist, Reinhard, Gunn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Berry v. BerryMissouri Court of Appeals· 1981-08-18· cited 12×
- In re the Marriage of BerryMissouri Court of Appeals· 2005-02-16· cited 11×
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1983-09-20· cited 9×
- State ex rel. Phelan v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals· 1998-03-24· cited 6×
- Wray v. WrayMissouri Court of Appeals· 2002-01-29· cited 5×
- Patel v. PatelMissouri Court of Appeals· 2012-10-02· cited 4×
- Nocito v. NocitoMissouri Court of Appeals· 1984-05-01· cited 3×
- Upchurch v. UpchurchMissouri Court of Appeals· 1989-04-11· cited 2×
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. BiggsMissouri Court of Appeals· 1981-03-31· cited 1×
- Kamesh Kumar Ramalingam v. Vidyarthini KumaresanMissouri Court of Appeals· 2020-06-09
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Ferrari v. Ferrari
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.