Ferrara & DiMercurio v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no prejudice where a new expert was designated three months before trial
• “When the factual underpinning of an expert opinion is weak, it is a matter affecting the weight and credibility of the testimony—a question to be resolved by the jury” (quoting Newell P.R., Ltd. v. Rubbermaid Inc., 20 F.3d 15, 21 (1st Cir. 1994))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).