Feroglio v. Paulsen
Citations
- 73 Wash. 417
- 131 P. 1163
- 1913 Wash. LEXIS 1614
Syllabus
<p>Master and Servant — Injury to Servant — “Safe Place” — Assumption of Risks — Fellow Servants. The duty to furnish a “safe place’-’ applies to an employee at work in a cut on a steep mountain side, struck by a rolling rock, where the master put men to work above him and attempted to protect his working place from falling rocks by placing brush as a barrier; since the employee had a right to assume that it was an eifective barrier, and negligence therein was not an assumed risk of the negligence of a fellow servant.</p> <p>Same — General and Special Verdicts — Consistency. Where an injury was due to an ineffective barrier, placed on a mountain side to protect a working place from falling rocks, a special verdict that the injury was due to the negligence of the foreman in charge of the work, is not inconsistent with a general verdict for the plaintiff.</p>
Judges: Mount
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Maloney v. Winston Bros.Idaho Supreme Court· 1910-05-09· cited 41×
- Campbell v. JonesWashington Supreme Court· 1910-10-03· cited 24×
- McLeod v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1911-09-14· cited 18×
- Creamer v. Moran Bros.Washington Supreme Court· 1906-02-19· cited 12×
- Howland v. Standard Milling & Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1908-07-11· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.