Fernstrom Storage and Van Company v. Fernstrom Storage and Van Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a proof of claim is unnecessary only where recovery will not “deplete the debtor’s assets or otherwise interfere with the administration of the bankruptcy proceeding, nor hinder the debtor’s fresh start at the close of the proceeding”
• adopting three-factor test of bankruptcy court for determining whether “cause” exists under § 362(d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).