Fernando v. Cleland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating in dictum that Rule 39(e) says nothing about time limit
• “[T]o secure the costs mentioned in Rule 39(e), the prevailing party must make a separate application to the district court after the mandate has been received from the court of appeals.”
• “[T]o secure the costs mentioned in Rule 39(e), the prevailing party must make a 21 separate application to the district court after the mandate has been received from the court of 22 appeals.” (original emphasis).
• explaining difference between costs under Rule 39(d) and 39(e)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).