Fernandez v. U.S. Bank Trust

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \It is true that a mere `disadvantage' to a defendant no longer amounts to an ex post facto violation.\
• “It is true that a mere ‘disadvantage’ to a defendant no longer amounts to an ex post facto violation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).