Fernandez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that value of stolen items, which included jewelry, was not proven with substantial competent evidence and remanding for a new restitution hearing
• finding that “the victim’s opinion alone was insufficient to support the amount awarded”
• “Even though property owners are generally qualified to testify ’ regarding the fair market value of their property, the amount of loss ‘must be established through more than mere speculation; it must be based on competent evidence.’ ” (citation omitted
• reversing restitution order based on the victim’s speculative testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• J.L.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-04-06· cited 9×
• Duncan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-06-01· cited 4×
• CRICKET KATHLEEN TOOLE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-02-20· cited 2×
• Leatherwood v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-03-15· cited 2×
• D.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-04-03· cited 2×
• C.J.H. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-05-06
• Holt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-11-14

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Glaubius v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-02-20· cited 94×
• Aboyoun v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-09· cited 15×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-06· cited 13×
• Rodriguez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-23· cited 9×
• Almodovar v. Gonzalez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-01-15· cited 6×