Fernandez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a “defendant’s failure to testify cannot directly or indirectly be the 20 subject of comment by the prosecution, but a reference to evidence or testimony that stands 21 uncontradicted is acceptable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tucker v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1966-04-11· cited 43×
• Brown v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1965-07-22· cited 32×
• Schnepp v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1966-06-22· cited 27×
• Hill v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1979-05-09· cited 20×
• Petition of DuBois
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1968-09-27· cited 18×
• Elsbury v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1974-01-31· cited 16×
• Miller v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 16×
• McNeeley v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1965-12-22· cited 15×
• Layton v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1971-12-08· cited 13×
• Washington v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1978-04-07· cited 10×
• Adams v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1965-11-02· cited 9×
• Moss v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1972-01-25· cited 9×
• Richardson v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1975-04-30· cited 7×
• Kirkland v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1979-02-07· cited 5×
• Poirier v. Board of Dental Examiners
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1965-10-15· cited 1×