Fernandez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the condition of probation requiring random testing should be stricken since “defendant is not prohibited from using alcohol and alcohol use is otherwise legal, random testing for alcohol serves no discernible purpose in this case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Watts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-03-05· cited 23×
• Spano v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-05-04· cited 3×
• Wines v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-03-27· cited 2×
• Carter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-08-07· cited 2×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-09-18· cited 1×
• Sanford v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-04· cited 1×
• Hardy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-07-17
• Bunn v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-01-22

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Beasley
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-05-09· cited 167×
• State v. Hart
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-02-22· cited 141×
• Biller v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-05-20· cited 106×
• Rodriguez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-10-31· cited 98×
• Nank v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-11-04· cited 71×
• Zeigler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-12-07· cited 16×
• Hayes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-08-27· cited 16×
• Catholic v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-02-23· cited 9×
• Richardson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-06-25· cited 9×
• Ward v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-09-03· cited 8×
• Dean v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-20· cited 6×
• Nunez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-18· cited 5×