Fernandez v. CENTRAL MINE EQUIPMENT CO.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the expert’s opinion was unreliable where the expert, among other things, did not inspect the subject drill, did not conduct any studies or analyses in developing his opinion and did not take any steps to verify his opinion
• finding that the expert’s opinion was unreliable where the expert, among other things, did not inspect the subject drill, did not conduct any studies or analyses in developing his opinion, and did not take any steps to verify his opinion
• “Having ruled that plaintiffs proposed expert testimony is inadmissible, plaintiff ‘has no evidence to support his claims that amounts to anything more than that he was injured’ while using the [the product] manufactured by defendants.” (alterations omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).