Skip to main content
· 2/24/2014

Fernandez-Rubio v. United States

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 1279
  • 188 L. Ed. 2d 312
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3492
  • 571 U.S. 1205
  • 2014 WL 684167
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 1527

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[C]ounsel should be able to rely on [an expert] to alert counsel to additional needed information . . .”
  • “[C]ounsel should be able to rely on [an expert] to alert counsel to additional needed information . . .”
  • “Without a red flag . . . it is too much to insist that counsel second-guess [his expert].”
  • “Without a red flag . . . it is too much to insist that counsel second-guess [his expert].”
  • “[C]ounsel should be able to rely on [an expert] to alert counsel to additional needed information . . .”
  • when specific allegations before a federal habeas court establish a reason to believe that the petitioner may, if facts are fully developed, demonstrate his entitlement to relief, the petitioner may be entitled to discovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.