Fernandez, Esther v. CenterPlate NBSE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether a defendant is an employer as defined by the FLSA does not implicate subject-matter jurisdiction
• holding that whether a defendant is an employer as defined by the FLSA does not implicate subject-matter jurisdiction
• applying Arbaugh and holding that whether plaintiff was paid overtime for hours worked in excess of 40 per week was not a jurisdictional limitation under the Fair Labor Standards Act
• “While the merits of Fernandez’s FLSA claim, turn on whether she was paid for hours worked in excess of forty per week, nothing in the FLSA suggests that a failure to prove this particular element of her cause of action requires a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.”
• “While the merits of Fernandez’s FLSA claim turn on whether she was paid for hours worked in excess of forty per week, nothing in the FLSA suggests that a failure to prove this particular element of her cause of action requires a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.”
• applying Arbaugh to the Fair Labor Standards Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).