Fernander v. Bonis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that there are exceptions to Florida’s impact rule, but applying the rule to dismiss a negligent-infliction-of-emotional-distress claim alleging a false arrest
• discussing probable cause in the context of an arrest warrant where the arresting officer was accused of malicious prosecution and false imprisonment, among other allegations
• “ ‘[Qualified immunity for government officials is the rule, liability and trials for liability the exception.’ ”
• “[T]he allegations of Fernander's complaint failed to satisfy section 768.28(9)(a) . . . . Fernander's factual allegations did not establish that [the officer] acted outside the scope of his employment or with wanton or willful disregard of Fernander's rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).