Skip to main content
· 3/7/1903

Fernald v. Spokane & British Columbia Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Citations

  • 31 Wash. 219
  • 71 P. 731
  • 1903 Wash. LEXIS 610

Syllabus

<p>RECEIVERS-APPOINTMENT BY COURTS OP CONCURRENT JURISDICTION -EXCLUSIVE CONTROL BELONGS TO FIRST APPOINTEE.</p> <p>Where the superior court of one county has appointed a general receiver for an insolvent corporation with power to take possession and control all its property, it is error for the superior court of another county to appoint either the same or another person receiver for such corporation, even if done on the theory that the subsequent appointment was merely to extend the existing receivership to a foreclosure suit against the corporate property.</p>

Judges: Mount

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.