Ferguson v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the statutory presumption of paternity under section 742.12(1), Florida Statutes (1989), is a rebuttable presumption and the legislature specifically provided that it was governed by section 90.304 of the evidence code
• explaining that the statutory presumption of paternity under section 742.12(1), Florida Statutes (1989), is a rebuttable presumption and the legislature specifically provided that it was governed by section 90.304 of the evidence code
• although Florida legislature has deemed HLA test results highly probative in paternity disputes, those test results are not always dispositive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Universal Insurance Co. of North America v. Warfel
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2012-01-26· cited 53×
• Warfel v. Universal Insurance Co. of North America
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-05-12· cited 9×
• Morris v. Crawford
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-28· cited 4×
• DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERV. v. Moore
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-10· cited 3×
• Seiler v. Stringham
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-17· cited 2×
• Perez v. Perez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-08-14

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Locklear v. Sampson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-11-13· cited 15×
• Dutilly v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERVICES
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-05-10· cited 13×
• Aetna Cas. & Sur. v. Pappagallo Rest.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-07-18· cited 9×
• Joyner v. Hair
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-03-25· cited 4×