Skip to main content
· 7/14/1982

Ferguson v. United Insurance Company of America

Citations

  • 293 S.E.2d 736
  • 163 Ga. App. 282
  • 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2467

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “insurance transactions are among those types of transactions which are exempt from the [FBPA],” but also finding that the Insurance Code “specifically defines the activity alleged in Ferguson’s petition as an unfair or deceptive act or practice”
  • “[I]nsurance transactions are among those types of transactions which are exempt from the Fair Business Practices Act.”
  • “[I]nsurance transactions are among those types of transactions which are exempt from the Fair Business Practices Act.”
  • summary judgment in favor of defendant was correctly granted under Fair Business Practices Act where insurance transactions were regulated by Insurance Code in that no insurer could transact insurance except as authorized by certificate of authority from insurance commissioner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sognier, Deen, Pope

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.