· 7/14/1982
Ferguson v. United Insurance Company of America
Citations
- 293 S.E.2d 736
- 163 Ga. App. 282
- 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2467
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “insurance transactions are among those types of transactions which are exempt from the [FBPA],” but also finding that the Insurance Code “specifically defines the activity alleged in Ferguson’s petition as an unfair or deceptive act or practice”
- “[I]nsurance transactions are among those types of transactions which are exempt from the Fair Business Practices Act.”
- “[I]nsurance transactions are among those types of transactions which are exempt from the Fair Business Practices Act.”
- summary judgment in favor of defendant was correctly granted under Fair Business Practices Act where insurance transactions were regulated by Insurance Code in that no insurer could transact insurance except as authorized by certificate of authority from insurance commissioner
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sognier, Deen, Pope
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.