Ferguson v. Ferguson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that former husband was not entitled to evidentiary hearing, on petition to modify alimony where he failed to demonstrate substantial change in circumstances since entry of a prior order denying modification of alimony from which he did not appeal
• reiterating that to modify an award of alimony, petitioner must show substantial change in circumstances, not contemplated at the time of the divorce judgment, which is sufficient, material, involuntary, and permanent in nature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• King v. King
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-03-07· cited 10×
• Trisotto v. Trisotto
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-21· cited 7×
• Hedstrom v. Hedstrom
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-10-18· cited 3×
• Cave v. Colon-Cave
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-11
• McKinnon v. Weinstein
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-28

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Canakaris v. Canakaris
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
• Pimm v. Pimm
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-05-28· cited 121×
• Smith v. Smith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-17· cited 11×
• Smith v. Cuban American National Foundation
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-07-19· cited 9×
• Douglas v. Douglas
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-20· cited 6×
• Hosford v. Hosford
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-09-12· cited 6×