Ferguson v. Ferguson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding it is inappropriate for the family court to average the property values testified to by the parties to arrive at a value
• South Carolina courts have held that retirement benefits are marital assets subject to equitable division

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wooten v. Wooten
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-06-06· cited 102×
• Hickum v. Hickum
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-10-30· cited 29×
• Shorb v. Shorb
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-03-19· cited 17×
• Gilfillin v. Gilfillin
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-03-26· cited 11×
• Gilfillin v. Gilfillin
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-02-03· cited 3×
• Cox v. Frierson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-05-03· cited 1×
• Thornton v. Thornton
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-10-02

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Reid v. Reid
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-13· cited 46×
• Burgess v. Burgess
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-01-12· cited 28×
• Noll v. Noll
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-11-28· cited 26×
• Kneece v. Kneece
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-06-27· cited 25×
• Johnson v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-03-13· cited 19×
• Martin v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-10-31· cited 18×
• Hardin v. Hardin
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-12-07· cited 13×
• Wood v. Wood
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-03-30· cited 6×