Ferguson v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellant has primary responsibility of ensuring that complete record is furnished to an appellate court so that errors assigned may be properly decided
• holding that “an appellant has the primary responsibility of ensuring that a complete record is furnished to an appellate court so that the errors assigned may be decided properly”
• holding that \an appellant has the primary responsibility of ensuring that a complete record is furnished to an appellate court so that the errors assigned may be decided properly\
• holding that appellant has primary responsibility of ensuring that complete record is furnished to an appellate court so that - 4 - errors assigned may be properly decided

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Twardy v. Twardy
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-06-09· cited 92×
• Robinson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-08-11· cited 47×
• Ferguson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-03-02· cited 38×
• Woodward v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-06-29· cited 28×
• White v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-03-19· cited 14×
• Rozario v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2007-07-24· cited 8×
• White v. Com.
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-04-24

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chapman v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
• United States v. Hasting
  Supreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 1,999×
• Arnold v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-06-02· cited 40×
• Scaggs v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-09-01· cited 28×
• Jones v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1978-01-13· cited 21×