Ferdinand v. City of Atlanta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court’s erroneous issuance of a permanent injunction after hearing on city’s motion for interlocutory injunction violated procedural notice requirements and could not be affirmed under the “right for any reason” rule
• trial court’s erroneous issuance of a permanent injunction after hearing on city’s motion for interlocutory injunction violated procedural notice requirements and could not be 15 affirmed under the “right for any reason” rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).