Skip to main content
· 2/9/1924

Fensterer & Voss Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 12 Ct. Cust. 105
  • 1924 WL 26654
  • 1924 CCPA LEXIS 16

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying modification because the husband Cite as 315 Or App 798 (2021) 813 had “not shown that the trial court did not contemplate that [his] income would fluctuate with economic conditions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agreement, Barber, Bland, Counsel, Hatfield, Martin, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.