Skip to main content
· 8/2/2024

Fenicle v. Heinze

Citations

  • 249 N.E.3d 360
  • 2024 Ohio 2941

Syllabus

Duhart. 1) Delayed ruling did not result in prejudice 2) Modifying child support before ruling on objections was not error 3) Child support order was improper to the extent that it ordered Mother to pay child support from April 2021 to March 2022 4) Mother properly named child support obligor 5) Rejecting stipulations was proper 6) Attorney fees were proper. 7) Tax dependency allocation was proper.

Judges: Duhart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.