· 2/10/1986
Feng v. Sandrik
Citations
- 636 F. Supp. 77
- 41 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 922
- 27 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1417
- 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29455
- 41 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,632
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- acknowledging that “spouses of individuals who have been victimized by employment discrimination cannot be said to fall within the class of persons Title VII was intended to protect”
- stating that § 255 applied to claims under § 215, in case where plaintiff had not argued otherwise but had contended that the limitations period had been tolled
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Aspen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.