Feng Dong v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that inconsistent statements can be valid reasons for discrediting alien, but alone are too weak to save the IJ’s otherwise undermined adverse credibility finding
• concluding that inconsistent statements are valid reasons for discrediting alien, but alone are too weak to save the IJ’s otherwise undermined adverse credibility finding
• noting that “use of false documents to enter the United States has no bearing on whether [applicant] was forced to terminate her pregnancy”
• “It is not relevant to [applicant’s] credibility that she avoided persecution during the four years she remained in China.”
• “The IJ’s skepticism alone, in light of [the applicant’s] consistent testimony, does not support a negative credibility determina- tion.”
• “an IJ should not rely on generalized Profiles or Country Reports to refute an No. 06-4239 3 applicant’s personal experience”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).