Fencorp, Co. v. OHIO KENTUCKY OIL CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in finding as established facts that rendered the defendants’ federal preemption defense void because defendants disobeyed three separate discovery requests
• holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in finding as established facts that rendered the defendants’ federal preemption defense void because defendants disobeyed three separate discovery requests
• “Defendants failed to raise th[e] argument that the jury’s verdict was internally inconsistent before the jury was discharged and, consequently, have waived this objection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).