Fence Creek Cattle Co. v. United States Forest Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying consideration of extra-record evidence where plaintiff failed to “show the additional materials sought [were] necessary to adequately review the Forest Service’s decision”
• “We think the voluminous record already before us is sufficient to conduct the necessary review under the APA.”
• “Generally, judicial review of an agency decision is limited to, the administrative record' on which the agency based the challenged decision,”
• “The plaintiff] has not met its heavy burden to show that the additional materials sought are necessary to adequately review the Forest Service’s decision here. . . . [The plaintiff] has failed to show any . . . gaps or holes [in the record].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).