Feminist Women's Health Center v. Burgess

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting federal third-party standing doctrine as defined in Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400, 411 (111 SCt 1364, 113 LE2d 411) (1991)
• applying Singleton to determine that a physician and several health care facilities had standing
• “As a general rule, a litigant has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a law only if the law has an adverse impact on that litigant’s own rights.”
• “In the absence of our own authority, we frequently have looked to United States Supreme Court precedent concerning Article III standing to resolve issues of standing to bring a claim in Georgia’s courts.”
• “In the absence of our own authority, we frequently have looked to United States Supreme Court precedent concerning Article III standing to resolve issues of standing to bring a claim in Georgia’s courts.”
• adopting the federal test for third-party standing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).