Skip to main content
· 1/27/2006

Felter v. Norton

Citations

  • 412 F. Supp. 2d 118
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2642
  • 2006 WL 197437

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that if statute of limitations is jurisdictional, it can- not be overcome by discovery rule
  • casting doubt on the proposition that § 2401 is a jurisdictional prerequisite to suit in federal court
  • “Traditionally, when a statute of limitations has been deemed jurisdictional, it has acted as an absolute bar and could not be overcome by the application of judicially recognized exceptions ... such as ... the continuing violations doctrine.”
  • rejecting the doctrine in a Native American rights context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.