Fellows v. School District No. 8 in Fayette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the statement made in Cummings v. Commonwealth, 226 S.W.3d 62, 66 (Ky. 2007
• explaining that the statement made in Cummings v. Commonwealth, 226 S.W.3d 62, 66 (Ky. 2007
• “Appellant’s argument that the imposition of restitution in excess of the $100,000.00 violated KRS 533.030(3) is a true ‘sentencing issue’ and we review it despite the lack of preservation.”
• distinguishing between arguments involving violations of statutes and procedural defects

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).