Feller v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering the merits of an affirmative defense raised in opposition to summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of defendants upon a review of the record
• \[A] plaintiff is not required to plead exhaustion of administrative remedies\ to support an ERISA claim
• “[C]onflicts are but one factor among many that a reviewing judge must take into account.”
• “[A] plaintiff is not required to plead exhaustion of the exact same clearly reimbursable services” without “legitimate justification,” (Am. Compl. ¶ 119) and provides the language of denials that they assert are unjustified, (id. ¶¶ 91-91

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).