Felix Valdez v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that discretionary act prong satisfied where suggestive Park Service policy guidelines at issue
• holding that discretionary act prong satisfied where suggestive Park Service policy guidelines at issue
• holding policy was 5 discretionary because government “cannot apprise the public of every potential danger”
• finding that while the “policy guidelines certainly outline general policy goals regarding visitor safety, the means by which NPS employees meet these goals necessarily involves an exercise of discretion”
• finding that while the “policy guidelines certainly outline general policy goals regarding visitor safety, the means by which NPS employees meet these goals necessarily involves an exercise of discretion”
• maximizing access and preservation of natural resources versus the need to minimize potential safety hazards

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).