Felix v. Michel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant was eligible despite judicial finding that he was responsible for 1.5 kilograms of crack cocaine
• noting that the court was authorized to impose a new sentence under § 404 of the First Step Act because, among other things, it “remain[ed] the ‘court that imposed a sentence for [the] covered offense’ ”
• finding in a First Step Act case that \[b]oth Apprendi and Alleyne are binding on this Court for sentencings held today.\
• “[T]he existence of a grant of clemency does not foreclose relief under the First Step Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).